Comments on: A Bloody Terrigal Day for Rees and all NSW.

By: A Bloody Terrigal Day for Rees and all NSW. « Alternative Media Group | Follow The Swarm

Wed, 18 May 2011 05:12:30 +0000

[...] Link: A Bloody Terrigal Day for Rees and all NSW. « Alternative Media Group [...]

By: Roger Hanney

Roger Hanney — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:04:16 +0000

p.s. replies directed to comments not yet visible will make far more sense once some of the evident glitches in the website’s new back-end are worked out.

By: Roger Hanney

Roger Hanney — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:56:48 +0000

These unsupported criticisms are as hilarious to read as they are baffling. I’ll pay $50 to the first reactionary commenter who can name a single established right-wing conservative identity with whom my expressed opinions align. Until any of the more vitriolic name-callers can claim that $50 – i.e. never – i expect that hundreds more words will be wasted on unsupported and blinkered tirades like this one.
And Sue, if you’d like to write an article about Frank Sartor’s deep concern for the public and his principled and perilous stand against developers and the imbalanced legislation that made all non-developers in NSW second-class citizens, i’m sure the ‘wiser counsel’ with whom i’m obviously not in contact would be happy to look it over.

By: Roger Hanney

Roger Hanney — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:41:36 +0000

You’re right Katie. I’m sorry. We should welcome ad hominem attacks and play mute while people who deeply resent others having an opinion express their opinion, with which all engagement, as opposed to dismissal, is actively discouraged. Irony much?

By: katie

katie — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:32:09 +0000

Maybe Danny won’t bother coming back to this site, or these publications. I don’t think I will again, it was a kind of perversity which made me read it today. Its a bit like stopping to stare at a horrible car accident, because that’s what City Hub now is.

Roger, you and your fellow increasingly intolerant ranters are are doing a fantastic job of driving progressive, fair minded people away.

What I found offensive (apart from the general tone) was that KKK stuff. Explain what that’s about, Roger? You know it reminds me of? Those conservative commentators in the US who before the election insisted on using Obama’s middle name. They were trying to make a slur by association stick.

Its a pathetic tactic Roger.

By: Nancy

Nancy — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:58:32 +0000

Excellent article. Finally someone is willing to tell it exactly like it is rather than trying to be careful and “neutral”. Good on you!

By: Roger Hanney

Roger Hanney — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:41:29 +0000

Hi Danny. That’s not going to happen, but why don’t you list some of the reasons why it’s offensive and why I should consider taking it down. Maybe I missed something.

By: Danny the Red

Danny the Red — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:30:06 +0000

This article is offensive, unnecessarily personally derogative, and it does your reputation no good. In fact it makes you look like a bad joke. You should consider taking it down

By: Sue

Sue — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:42:36 +0000

What a bitter, twisted, misogynist and probably racist (white Americans are fair game) article! Its just as well the author didn’t “check with his editor” before posting this, as I’m assuming wiser counsel would have prevailed. But now I think someone should pull this off your website.

As it stands, it finally lays to rest any notion that City Hub is a progressive thinking and fair minded publication.

It has lined itself up with some very curious allies, all of them on the conservative right

You are sounding like cranks. Reactionary, bigoted cranks!

And the funny thing is, Minister of “Long lunches and handshakes” (what does that mean? just a slur without any evidence?) Sartor was sacked because he fell out with developers groups. He wouldn’t give them what they wanted.

You didn’t know that? Of course not, City Hub is clueless as well as nasty.

By: Tom McLoughin

Tom McLoughin — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:36:03 +0000

Tell us what you really think!