<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do they do with the meat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altmedia.net.au/what-do-they-do-with-the-meat/15365/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altmedia.net.au/what-do-they-do-with-the-meat/15365</link>
	<description>Your local news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Head</title>
		<link>http://www.altmedia.net.au/what-do-they-do-with-the-meat/15365#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altmedia.net.au/?p=15365#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Japan&#039;s continued and expanded program of scientific whaling is inconsistent with its obligations under the Law of the Sea Convention, the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling Convention, the Convention on the 
Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), and the Convention on Biological Diversity to protect and preserve the marine environment, to protect rare and fragile ecosystems and endangered species, to prepare environmental impact assessments when changes to the marine 
environment are likely to be caused by its activities, and to refrain from claiming resources under the guise of marine scientific research.  This program is not legitimately &quot;scientific&quot; because it has not been 
peer-reviewed and does not have precise quantifiable goals.  It is inconsistent with Japan&#039;s obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity because reduces the sustainability of whale species and has &quot;adverse impacts on biological diversity.&quot;  It is unquestionably an abuse of 
right because it invokes Article VIII of the Whaling Convention in a manner that certainly was unanticipated by the framers of the Convention and has been repeatedly condemned by the majority of the other contracting parties 
to the Convention.
 Japan&#039;s actions can be challenged by concerned states in the International Court of Justice or through the dispute resolution procedures of the Law of the Sea Convention and the conciliation procedures of the Convention on Biological 
Diversity. 
Plus a few other irregularities. But while no Government seems to have the intestinal fortutude to take legal remedies it is left to the SSCS to protect whales in whatever way it can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan&#8217;s continued and expanded program of scientific whaling is inconsistent with its obligations under the Law of the Sea Convention, the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling Convention, the Convention on the<br />
Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), and the Convention on Biological Diversity to protect and preserve the marine environment, to protect rare and fragile ecosystems and endangered species, to prepare environmental impact assessments when changes to the marine<br />
environment are likely to be caused by its activities, and to refrain from claiming resources under the guise of marine scientific research.  This program is not legitimately &#8220;scientific&#8221; because it has not been<br />
peer-reviewed and does not have precise quantifiable goals.  It is inconsistent with Japan&#8217;s obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity because reduces the sustainability of whale species and has &#8220;adverse impacts on biological diversity.&#8221;  It is unquestionably an abuse of<br />
right because it invokes Article VIII of the Whaling Convention in a manner that certainly was unanticipated by the framers of the Convention and has been repeatedly condemned by the majority of the other contracting parties<br />
to the Convention.<br />
 Japan&#8217;s actions can be challenged by concerned states in the International Court of Justice or through the dispute resolution procedures of the Law of the Sea Convention and the conciliation procedures of the Convention on Biological<br />
Diversity.<br />
Plus a few other irregularities. But while no Government seems to have the intestinal fortutude to take legal remedies it is left to the SSCS to protect whales in whatever way it can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

